Blog Details

"Where should we start with automation?" This is perhaps the most common question organizations ask when beginning their automation journey. With limited resources and countless processes that could potentially be automated, prioritizing the right opportunities is critical to success.

At AIx Automation, we've guided hundreds of automation initiatives across diverse industries. Through this experience, we've developed a systematic approach to identifying and prioritizing automation opportunities that maximize return on investment while building momentum for broader transformation.

In this article, we'll share our proven methodology for finding high-value automation candidates, evaluating their potential, and developing a strategic implementation roadmap. Whether you're just beginning your automation journey or looking to expand existing initiatives, these approaches will help you identify the opportunities with the greatest potential impact.

The Automation Opportunity Challenge

Most organizations face a fundamental challenge when starting with automation: they have too many potential processes to automate and limited resources to implement them. This creates a crucial prioritization problem that must be solved methodically rather than based on intuition or organizational politics.

Common pitfalls in selecting automation opportunities include:

1. Starting with the most complex processes that promise big returns but carry high implementation risks
2. Following the HiPPO (Highest Paid Person's Opinion) rather than using objective evaluation criteria
3. Focusing exclusively on cost reduction while overlooking other value dimensions
4. Automating broken processes without first optimizing them
5. Ignoring implementation prerequisites like data quality or system integration requirements

These missteps often lead to failed automation projects, wasted resources, and diminished organizational confidence in automation as a strategic approach. To avoid these pitfalls, a systematic opportunity identification and evaluation methodology is essential.

The Three-Phase Opportunity Identification Framework

Our proven approach to identifying automation opportunities consists of three sequential phases:

Phase 1: Opportunity Discovery

Systematically uncover potential processes for automation across the organization.

Phase 2: Opportunity Evaluation

Apply a multi-dimensional assessment framework to evaluate and rank opportunities.

Phase 3: Opportunity Roadmapping

Develop a strategic implementation sequence that balances quick wins with long-term value.

Let's explore each phase in detail.

Phase 1: Opportunity Discovery

The first step is to cast a wide net to identify potential automation candidates across the organization. This discovery phase should be comprehensive, inclusive, and focused on understanding current processes before making judgments about automation potential.

Discovery Approaches

We recommend using multiple complementary approaches to ensure comprehensive discovery:

Bottom-Up Discovery

Engage frontline staff who perform processes daily through:

• Process pain point workshops: Facilitated sessions where teams identify their most challenging, time-consuming, or error-prone processes
• Time allocation surveys: Simple questionnaires asking staff to estimate time spent on various activities
• Process observation: Direct shadowing of work to identify repetitive tasks and inefficiencies
• Workaround documentation: Collecting examples of manual workarounds for system limitations

Top-Down Discovery

Leverage leadership perspective and organizational data through:

• Strategic initiative alignment: Identifying processes critical to key strategic objectives
• Performance bottleneck analysis: Using operational data to identify process constraints
• Customer journey mapping: Tracing end-to-end customer experiences to find friction points
• Compliance and audit findings: Reviewing risk areas identified in audit reports

Systems-Based Discovery

Examine technical and data perspectives through:

• System interface mapping: Documenting manual data transfers between systems
• Report inventory analysis: Reviewing manually produced regular reports
• Exception handling review: Identifying processes for managing exceptions from core systems
• Data quality issue tracking: Examining processes related to data cleansing and correction

Documentation Approach

For each potential opportunity identified, document:

1. Process name and description: Clear definition of the process scope
2. Current process owner: Individual or team responsible for the process
3. Estimated volume: Frequency and quantity of process execution
4. Estimated manual effort: Time currently required to perform the process
5. Systems involved: Technical systems that support or connect to the process
6. Initial pain points: Known challenges or inefficiencies
7. Potential value hypothesis: Initial assessment of how automation might add value

This documentation provides the foundation for the evaluation phase. We recommend documenting at least 20-30 potential opportunities to ensure sufficient breadth before moving to detailed evaluation.

Phase 2: Opportunity Evaluation

With a comprehensive list of potential automation candidates, the next step is to evaluate each opportunity using a consistent, multi-dimensional framework. This ensures objective prioritization based on potential value, feasibility, and strategic alignment.

The Automation Opportunity Evaluation Matrix

We use a scoring framework that evaluates potential automation opportunities across three key dimensions:

Dimension 1: Value Potential (40%)

Assesses the potential benefits of automating the process:

• Volume and frequency (10%): How often the process occurs and in what quantity
• Time intensity (10%): How much manual time the process currently requires
• Error impact (8%): The cost or consequence of errors in the current process
• Strategic importance (7%): How directly the process supports strategic objectives
• Customer experience impact (5%): How the process affects customer satisfaction

Dimension 2: Implementation Feasibility (40%)

Evaluates how readily the process can be automated:

• Process stability (10%): How consistent and well-defined the process is
• Rule clarity (10%): How clearly the decision rules can be articulated
• Data accessibility (8%): Whether required data is digitally available and accessible
• System integration complexity (7%): The technical complexity of connecting systems
• Exception frequency (5%): How often the process requires special handling or judgment

Dimension 3: Organizational Readiness (20%)

Considers the organizational context for implementation:

• Business owner engagement (8%): Level of support from the process owner
• Change complexity (7%): Degree of workflow and role changes required
• Resource availability (5%): Availability of required subject matter experts and technical support

Scoring Methodology

Each criterion is scored on a 1-5 scale:

• 1: Very low/negative
• 2: Below average
• 3: Average
• 4: Above average
• 5: Excellent/very positive

Weighted scores are calculated for each dimension, and a total opportunity score is generated on a 100-point scale. This scoring should be done collaboratively with input from process owners, technical teams, and business leadership to ensure balanced assessment.

Evaluation Output

The evaluation phase should produce:

1. Ranked opportunity list: All potential opportunities sorted by total score
2. Opportunity quadrant visualization: A matrix plotting value potential against implementation feasibility
3. Dimension detail: Breakdown of scores by evaluation criterion for deeper understanding
4. Preliminary ROI estimates: High-level projections of potential returns for top opportunities

This thorough evaluation provides the basis for strategic roadmap development.

Phase 3: Opportunity Roadmapping

The final phase leverages evaluation results to develop a strategic implementation sequence. Rather than simply implementing opportunities in score order, the roadmap should balance multiple strategic considerations.

Strategic Sequencing Principles

Effective automation roadmaps typically follow these principles:

1. Balance Quick Wins with Foundational Capabilities

Alternate between:

• Quick win opportunities: High-scoring, relatively simple processes that can demonstrate value rapidly
• Foundation-building opportunities: Processes that establish capabilities for future automation

2. Cluster Related Processes

Group processes that:

• Share similar technical requirements
• Affect the same department or user group
• Utilize common data sources or systems

3. Consider Dependency Relationships

Sequence opportunities based on:

• Technical prerequisites (e.g., API development before integration)
• Process flow dependencies (upstream before downstream processes)
• Data quality dependencies (data cleansing before automated analytics)

4. Distribute Organizational Impact

Balance implementation across:

• Different business units or departments
• Various levels of organizational complexity
• Different user populations

Roadmap Time Horizons

Structure the roadmap into three distinct time horizons:

Horizon 1: Immediate Opportunities (0-6 months)

Focus on:

• Highest-scoring quick wins that build credibility
• Foundational capabilities necessary for later phases
• Processes with strong executive sponsorship

Horizon 2: Medium-Term Opportunities (6-18 months)

Include:

• More complex high-value processes
• Opportunities that build on Horizon 1 capabilities
• Processes requiring moderate preparation or optimization

Horizon 3: Long-Term Opportunities (18+ months)

Encompass:

• Most complex, transformational opportunities
• Processes requiring significant prerequisites
• Emerging opportunities that may need reevaluation

Roadmap Documentation

The final automation opportunity roadmap should include:

1. Visual timeline: Graphical representation of implementation sequence
2. Opportunity clusters: Logical groupings of related opportunities
3. Key dependencies: Critical path relationships between opportunities
4. Value projections: Estimated cumulative value over the roadmap timeline
5. Resource requirements: High-level estimation of implementation resources needed

This comprehensive roadmap provides a strategic guide for automation implementation while maintaining flexibility to adapt as organizational needs and technological capabilities evolve.

Case Study: Manufacturing Supply Chain Automation

A mid-sized manufacturing company applied this three-phase approach to identify automation opportunities within their supply chain operations:

Discovery Phase Findings

The company used multiple discovery approaches including:

• Process observation across warehouse and logistics functions
• Time allocation surveys with supply chain staff
• System interface mapping of their ERP and logistics systems
• Bottleneck analysis of order fulfillment

This comprehensive discovery identified 28 potential automation opportunities across procurement, inventory management, production planning, and logistics.

Evaluation Results

The top five opportunities based on their evaluation matrix were:

1. Purchase Order Processing (Score: 92)

   • High volume (4,000+ POs monthly)
   • Significant manual data entry (2.5 hours daily)
   • Clear business rules for 85% of cases
   • Strong procurement team support

2. Inventory Exception Handling (Score: 89)

   • Critical operational impact
   • 15+ hours weekly spent resolving discrepancies
   • Well-documented exception patterns
   • Direct impact on production reliability

3. Shipment Documentation (Score: 87)

   • Heavy customer experience impact
   • Error-prone manual process (12% error rate)
   • Straightforward data extraction requirements
   • Significant compliance implications

4. Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Adjustments (Score: 84)

   • Complex but high-value process
   • Requires integration with multiple systems
   • Strong strategic alignment with reliability goals
   • Potential for significant labor savings (30+ hours weekly)

5. Supplier Performance Reporting (Score: 78)

   • Entirely manual report generation process
   • Low complexity for basic automation
   • Moderate strategic impact
   • Strong leadership interest in the output

Roadmap Development

Rather than implementing strictly by score, the company developed a strategic roadmap:

Horizon 1 (0-6 months):

• Purchase Order Processing (quick win with high visibility)
• Supplier Performance Reporting (simple technical implementation)
• API development for ERP system (foundation for future opportunities)

Horizon 2 (6-18 months):

• Inventory Exception Handling (builds on ERP API foundation)
• Shipment Documentation (requires data quality improvements)
• Several medium-scoring logistics processes sharing similar technology

Horizon 3 (18+ months):

• Material Requirements Planning Adjustments (complex but transformational)
• Integrated supply chain optimization (building on earlier automations)
• Vendor-managed inventory processes (requiring partner integration)

Implementation Results

By following this structured approach, the company:

• Achieved 85% automation of PO processing within four months
• Delivered cumulative time savings of 120+ hours weekly within the first year
• Built critical technical foundations for more complex opportunities
• Maintained strong organizational support through visible quick wins
• Avoided false starts on complex processes before prerequisites were in place

The systematic opportunity identification approach ensured resources were directed to the highest-value, most feasible opportunities while building momentum for the broader automation initiative.

Practical Tips for Effective Opportunity Identification

Based on our experience guiding numerous organizations through this process, we offer these practical recommendations:

For the Discovery Phase

• Create psychological safety: Emphasize that identifying automation opportunities is about enhancing work, not eliminating jobs
• Use structured templates: Provide simple, consistent formats for documenting potential opportunities
• Involve diverse perspectives: Include technical, operational, and customer-facing roles in discovery activities
• Focus on process understanding: Thoroughly document current processes before evaluating automation potential
• Quantify where possible: Gather baseline metrics on process frequency, duration, and error rates

For the Evaluation Phase

• Involve process experts: Ensure scoring involves people who deeply understand each process
• Validate assumptions: Test key assumptions through limited observation or data analysis
• Consider technology context: Evaluate opportunities in the context of your specific technology landscape
• Challenge "pet projects": Apply the same rigorous evaluation to leadership favorites
• Document rationale: Record reasoning behind scores to support later prioritization discussions

For the Roadmapping Phase

• Engage executive sponsorship: Secure leadership buy-in for the roadmap approach
• Build in reflection points: Schedule regular reassessment of the roadmap as implementation progresses
• Consider capability building: Include skills development alongside process implementation
• Plan for process optimization: Allocate time to improve processes before automation
• Communicate the strategy: Share the roadmap rationale with stakeholders to build support

Conclusion

Identifying the right automation opportunities is perhaps the most crucial step in any automation journey. A systematic approach to discovery, evaluation, and roadmapping dramatically increases the likelihood of successful implementation and sustainable value creation.

By casting a wide discovery net, applying a multi-dimensional evaluation framework, and developing a strategically sequenced roadmap, organizations can ensure their automation investments target the right processes in the right sequence. This methodical approach builds organizational confidence, delivers consistent value, and establishes the foundation for long-term automation success.

At AIx Automation, we help organizations apply this proven methodology to identify their highest-value automation opportunities and develop strategic implementation roadmaps. If you're interested in exploring how this approach might apply to your organization, contact us for a consultation or explore our Automation Opportunity Assessment service.